Judging Politicians On Their Job Performance, Not Their Residency

Kurly’s Kommentary
“Bringing common sense back to political commentary”
  

Huffington Post Domestic squabbles: Residency prerequisites are outdated & rather stupid

         Published in The Huffington Post & The Florida Squeeze on 04/18/2013

 

 

  

“We are not living in the 1800’s anymore. In this day and age of electronic communication and quick, instantaneous mobility, politicians can in fact truly relate to voters and represent an election district well without actually physically living there.”

Yet, even if Bloomberg is right, I don’t want him or any government leader to limit 

Carpetbagging should be a nonissue in 21st Century America
by Steven Kurlander

Throughout American history, there have been controversies about the fulfillment-and necessity of fundamental constitutional prerequisites that a candidate must meet to run for political office.

 

Perhaps the most famous controversy in our time was whether President Obama actually was born in the US, one of the basic requirements to hold the office of the presidency specified by Article II of the US Constitution.

 

After years of persistent attacks from a crazed “birther” movement which alleged he was born in Kenya, the president eventually produced in 2011 a Hawaiian “certificate of live birth” to finally show he was born on American soil and put to rest, for most, this debate.

 

But the true, fundamental question that arose from this controversy was not whether Obama was a natural born US citizen, but if it is fair or wise that a nation of immigrants precludes its naturalized American citizens from being president.

 

Another fundamental requirement that is universal in the American political system is that candidates must meet certain residency requirements when they qualify to run for office.

 

And recently, a controversy over a Florida’s state senator’s “residency” once again brought the question of whether a politician should be required to actually live in his or her district, or even if in the 21st century if there should be any residency requirements at all.

 

State Sen. Jack Latvala, R-Clearwater, chairman of the Senate Ethics and Elections Committee, charged that Senator Maria Sachs uses the address of a condominium owned by Judith Stern, a Broward political consultant, and her daughter, as her means of establishing residency in her district-and was “violating the law.”

 

Latvala accused Sachs of actually living on a 5 acre equestrian estate with her husband near Boca Raton and that she rented Stern’s condo solely for the purposes of running in and serving the district she now represents in the Florida Senate.

 

Sachs had a simple retort to the allegations. She told The Miami Herald, “I have fully met the requirements of the law regarding legal residency in District 34.”

 

Practically speaking, the residency of a politician has never stopped some very prominent politicians from running in districts or states where they never even lived. Residency requirements are often very minimal, compelling a candidate to be registered to vote in the district they are running in and that they declare their “domicile” there.

 

Remember Hillary Clinton’s quick move to New York to run for the Senate. It only took her 30 days of living in haughty Westchester County to allow her to qualify to run for office and win office there.

 

Interestingly enough, the US constitution does not mandate that a congressman live in the district he or she represents, but only that they live in the state they are elected from.

 

That allowed former Congressman Allen West to live in his arch nemeses Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s district while representing an adjacent district and to engage in cat fights with her from there.

 

West dismissed criticism about his residency at the time: “I don’t think it should be a concern to voters. The Constitution just says you have to live in the state you’re running in at the time of the election,” he said. “I don’t see myself as some kind of carpetbagger.”

 

And West was right. We are not living in the 1800s anymore. In this day and age of electronic communication and quick, instantaneous mobility, politicians can in fact truly relate to voters and represent an election district well without actually physically living there.

 

In this day and age, politicians really don’t have to live in a district to respond to the needs of the people they represent there. And in terms of understanding and empathizing with a district’s quirks and history, the evolution of the US into a homogenous culture and society has really eliminated such a concern.

 

So what true difference would it really make if Sachs moved her husband and horses to her district, other than to make her commute to Tallahassee a little bit longer?

 

Like the president’s pedigree, the residency of Senator Sachs should not be a constitutional issue or a political one either. If our founding fathers did not find it necessary that a Congressman live in the district he serves, then the constitutional residency requirements in the Florida constitution, and in other states, may be overly restrictive, particularly these days

 

Surely Sachs spends more than enough time in her district, and communicating with her constituency by PDA, computer, and telephone too, to do her job without the requirement that she truly sleep there every night too.

 

In the end, as West put it, voters aren’t really concerned about where their representatives live, and neither should Senator Latvala be too

 

Kurly

Click & Buy Today
Read Kurly’s First Novel! Buy the Google eBook Version of The Dog Days of September by Steven Kurlander for only $3.03. It’s a novel about a

father who dies in the 9/11 World Trade Center attack, a son who goes to fight to avenge his death and how this Iraq War Veteran who comes home after two tours of duty, but never leaves the battle behind him. 
Like The Dog Days of September Facebook Page Too! Like us on Facebook

Kurly’s Latest Quora Question: How come @MLB uniforms don’t have advertising logos like @NASCAR cars?  Backdrops & scoreboard already have them. Why not players? Click & Answer

 

Tweet of the Week

Celebrating 4/20 with wine coolers and rum to set good example for the kiddies @aaronkurlander @jodilkurl  #honestdad #goodparenting

 

 Sign up to receive updates from The Florida Squeeze by email.

 

 

Chan Lowe’s Latest Cartoon and Blog: The Boston Marathon bombers

 

If You Want To Be Removed From Kurly Kommentary Subscriber List, email me

Like me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter Find me on Google+

border
Steven Kurlander, Communications Strategist, 390 Broadway, Monticello, NY 12701
(845) 796-8948 – skurl@aol.comwww.stevenkurlander.com
Copyright © 2013, Steven Kurlander

Like us on Facebook Follow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedInFind us on Google+Visit our blog

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s